carbon dioxide emissions http://www.artwoo.com Returned search results for carbon dioxide emissions Copyright 2008 Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:50:13 +0000 http://www.artwoo.com/rss/carbon+dioxide+emissions Carbon Offsetting http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-offsetting http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-offsetting#comments Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:27:02 +0000 kyoto protocoltargetgreenhouse effectcarbon dioxidekyoto commitmentburning of fossil fuelsplanting trees http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-offsetting
Well, basically carbon offsetting helps you to offset the that you use when flying or driving etc by or installing solar panels and thereby removing your contribution to global climate change. You contribute to pollution by driving; you reduce the pollution by planting trees! You are carbon neutral!

What is Carbon Dioxide?

Carbon Dioxide is an inevitable product of the way we all live today. It is produced primarily through the in: -

•electricity generation •the powering of vehicles, trains and aircraft •home heating and cooking (gas, wood, coal, oil)

Using Renewable Energy is one way of reducing the amount of fossil fuel that we burn via homes and businesses.

Gases released into the atmosphere by human activity are forming an insulating barrier around the Earth, preventing the natural release of heat from our atmosphere. There are a number of gases that are held responsible for this process, which is sometimes referred to as 'the '. While methane and other gases contribute to the problem, the chief culprit, by virtue of the volumes produced, is carbon dioxide. Currently, around one quarter of carbon emissions are absorbed by the soil and one quarter by the oceans.

The , negotiated by more than 160 nations, aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by setting legally binding emissions reduction s for developed countries. Under Kyoto, the UK's target is to cut its emissions by 12.5 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-2012. However, the UK government is convinced that the UK can and should go further. The Kyoto Protocol is only the first step. The Government has therefore set a domestic goal to go further than the and cut the UK's emissions of carbon dioxide by 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2010.

You Can Make a Difference, This is How

You, your business or employer may be already taking steps to tackle their carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions at source using renewable energy and efficiency measures wherever possible. An initiative that offers extra action for businesses to offset their remaining CO2 emissions through tree planting.

By supporting tree planting across the UK, businesses can help to create valuable woodland that will grow to sequester (absorb and store) CO2 pollution and in so doing, help with the fight against climate change.

In addition to the environmental benefits of absorbing atmospheric carbon as they grow and mature, woodland provides a rich and important habitat valued by wildlife and people alike. By using a simple carbon calculator you can obtain an idea of how much carbon dioxide you, your family, your business are responsible for producing each year. Using data sources you can calculate how many trees you need to plant to offset or balance your carbon dioxide production. Your lifestyle can then be said to be carbon neutral or balanced.

Visit GuideMeGreen for various companies that can neutralize your carbon contribution. I work with the Green and Ethical directory http://www.guidemegreen.com This growing green resource lists 100s of Organic, Fairtrade, Eco and Ethical companies and Articles at http://articles.guidemegreen.com/ We also have loads of jobs at http://jobs.guidemegreen.com/ ]]> Carbon Trading -- What's All That About? http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-trading-whats-all-that-about http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-trading-whats-all-that-about#comments Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:32:07 +0000 countries in africadeveloping countriesgreenhouse gasesgreenhouse gasglobal warmingcarbon dioxideclimate change policy http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-trading-whats-all-that-about climate change policy in the EU and USA.

Firms are set quotas on how much they can produce per year, if they produce more than this allowance, then they buy an allowance from another firm that has not reached it's quota on how much it can produce in one year! Get it?

Emissions Trading is particularly suited to the emissions of es, the gases responsible for , which have the same effect wherever they are emitted.

Emissions of carbon dioxide - a greenhouse gas - are widely thought to be a key factor in global warming, and increasing atmospheric temperatures around the world.

The idea of the carbon-trading scheme was to raise the cost to firms of continuing to pollute while creating a market to give an incentive to become more environmentally efficient. They are traded in a similar way to buying and selling shares, there are a number of companies that offer the buying and selling of carbon units and many offer different commissions and even free trading if you shop around. I even saw one firm that offered a one stop shopping for Renewable Energy, Biodiversity, and Greenhouse Gas. Its like an online retailer but for things you can't touch. Ill have 2 pounds of apples, a bag of potatoes and a Biodiversity credit please!!!

On an international level countries are able to deal in carbon trading The potential benefits of such a system for would be that poorer, developing countries can sell there surplus carbon dioxide to richer countries. This income could stimulate much needed economic growth. They could also achieve their Kyoto commitments at the lowest possible cost as the money needed to invest in cleaner technology can be funded by the trading on carbon units. Countries like the USA and UK could pay the to REFOREST there lands, this reduction in carbon dioxide in the planet would then allow USA/UK firms to emit extra carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It would probably be cheaper to REFOREST parts of Africa then to buy state of the art cleaner technology for firms in the West. How many trees could you plant for a million dollars/pounds in Africa?

The cost of cleaner technology in the West obviously varies from industry to industry, size of the company, technological advances available etc but surely a company would not trade CO2 unless we were talking big money. Carbon trading sounds a bit strange to me, as you are trading air, but if this leads to more trees being planted and a reduction in climate change -- Im all for it! David Oglaza is the founder of the Green and Ethical business http://www.guidemegreen.com . This growing green resource lists 100s of Organic, Fairtrade, Eco and Ethical companies. We even have Green jobs and a Green Forum! ]]> What is Green Car Insurance? http://www.artwoo.com/article/what-is-green-car-insurance http://www.artwoo.com/article/what-is-green-car-insurance#comments Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:08:29 +0000 greenhouse gas emissionscarbon dioxide emissionscar insurance policygreenhouse gasesinsurance premiumspollution levelsgreen car http://www.artwoo.com/article/what-is-green-car-insurance greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, as petrol gets burnt. These contribute to almost 12% of the total greenhouse gas emissions that the UK experiences.

The UK tries to reduce its dependence on machines and cars in order to ensure an environment with lower . The option of a Green provides the UK with an opportunity to contribute to the upkeep of the environment, even after using a car.

What is Insurance?

A Green Car Insurance policy allows you to contribute a part of your monthly premium to a scheme that aims to offset the from your car. In this way you can attempt to neutralise the ill effects that your vehicle causes to the environment. The amount that goes to the scheme is arrived at after considering facts like the model and the age of the car. Often a more advanced system of calculation involving the driving technique is also used.

A vehicle that spews out huge amounts of gas will have a premium higher than a sophisticated and well-maintained vehicle whose gas emissions are nominal. This is because a larger proportion of the premium would be necessary to neutralise the high percentages of carbon dioxide emissions from the gas-guzzling vehicle. Thus, if you use a fuel-efficient car, you are rewarded with a lower insurance premium and if you use cars with low fuel-efficiency you need to compensate accordingly by paying higher .

Is the concept of Green Car Insurance getting accepted?

Green Car Insurance is a growing concept as more and more insurance providers are including the "green" option in their packages of not only car insurance but also those of home and travel insurance. This can be seen as a change in the attitude of the common man as he realises the intensity of the threat to which our earth has been exposed. The insurance industry is acting in accordance to the need of the hour.

The fundamental concept on which insurance works, is that of protection against risk. So the insurance industry can relate to the need of protecting planet earth and reducing the risks of pollution and climate change.

How can you get a Green Car Insurance policy?

The number of insurance providers who are formulating policies that include "green" options, is increasing day by day. Unfortunately these "environment-friendly" insurance options are not yet advertised as much as the regular options.

If you are conscious about the need of the hour, you can ask your insurance provider whether they have a green insurance policy.

You can also search for green insurance providers online. The Internet will provide you with numerous comparison facilities that will assist you in finding the cheapest but "greenest" insurance option available.

You can save on your premium by using a fuel-efficient vehicle and avoiding the usage of gas-guzzling components like air-conditioners.

Thus, if you cannot avoid using a car, you still can contribute to the maintenance of the planet earth by opting for a Green Car Insurance policy.eGreen Insurance provides Green Car Insurance policies which contribute to the global effort of conserving our natural resources and the environment.]]> Hybrids Reduce Gas Emissions http://www.artwoo.com/article/hybrids-reduce-gas-emissions http://www.artwoo.com/article/hybrids-reduce-gas-emissions#comments Wed, 25 Oct 2006 06:27:06 +0000 hybrid carsair pollutiontoyota priusgreen house gaseshonda insighthybrid modelstoxic gases http://www.artwoo.com/article/hybrids-reduce-gas-emissions Honda insight can reach above sixty mpg) but reduce their gas emissions and considerably. , for example has a 90% reduction in the amount of pollution that would otherwise be in the air. And although this is not perfect it has improved the current standard considerably

About one third of air pollution is caused by the fuel used in cars. The major culprit is the carbon dioxide which causes global warming. Compared to regular cars, the Toyota Prius reduces the amount of carbon dioxide by fifty percent. And the hybrid made by Honda has reduced its emissions by two thirds. Nitrogen oxide, a chemical found in car emissions, not only causes global warming, but will cause acid rain and lung irritations. Hydrocarbons is another substance found in gas emissions from a car and this can cause birth defects or lung cancer. Lead is also released in the air as is carbon monoxide every time the car is in motion. Imagine sitting in rush hour with all those being released in the air.

With a hybrid the gases and other substances are dramatically reduced. Because more and more people are becoming concerned about air pollution and global warming, car makers are rushing to meet the demand. There are the from Toyota and Honda and Ford. But Saturn and Mazda and GM are following suit.

The EPA is also participating in encouraging this trend by supplying more information to the consumer about the . There are new ratings in place. One is the ultra low emissions vehicle (ULEV) and the other is the super low emissions vehicle (SLEV). The hybrids on the market today receive either one of the ratings but regular cars never reach the mark.

There is a system in place that the EPA uses to rate cars. It gives two scores, one for the and the other for air pollution. In the seventies, there was a law passed that required cars to keep to certain standards. Regular cars barely met the requirement. Even if you took into consideration things like speed, weather or location, that may change the outcome of results. It doesn't reduce the high scores of the hybrids. In fact, this score can be perfect at times because the hybrid runs on electric power too. So that reliance on gas is decreased, making the hybrid the better choice of car in the market today for the EPA Jackson Porter is a staff writer at http://www.environmental-central.com and is an occasional contributor to several other websites, including http://www.automobileenthusiast.com. ]]> The Global Warming Debate: How To Save Mother Earth http://www.artwoo.com/article/the-global-warming-debate-how-to-save-mother-earth http://www.artwoo.com/article/the-global-warming-debate-how-to-save-mother-earth#comments Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:24:59 +0000 carbon dioxide emissionseffects of global warminggreenhouse gasesburning fossil fuelsrenewable energy sourcesagree that thereenergy conservation http://www.artwoo.com/article/the-global-warming-debate-how-to-save-mother-earth agree that there is general evidence supporting the idea that global warming is occurring. The thing they are unable to agree on is if the global warming is being caused by our actions, or if it is a natural part of the earth's evolution.

The Evidence

It is possible to measure some parts of the environment to identify current trends. For example, the levels of methane and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher now than they have ever been in the past 650 years. The glaciers are melting at an increasing rate, and coral reefs are being destroyed due to increasing temperatures.

The

Among the facts about global warming is the cause of the warming. Greenhouse gases cover the atmosphere and trap the sun's heat. Carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide are emissions that cause greenhouse gases. is a fact about global warming that is the cause of most . We burn fossil fuels when we drive our cars and generate electricity in power plants. Reducing these emissions is the most important reason everyone needs to know the facts about global warming.

Public Education

It is important that people learn about the and hear both sides of the argument =96 it may be that global warming cannot be prevented, but if everyone learns about global warming and researches environmental issues for themselves, they will be able to make more educated choices, and understand other conservation issues at the same time. Global warming is not the only thing we need to be concerned about =96 many resources are being rapidly depleted, and will benefit the environment in many ways.

Small Changes Do Help

We can all help reduced the pollutants released everyday by changing our transportation choices, changing our light bulbs, use and conserving paper products.



Automobiles cause twenty percent of United States carbon dioxide emissions. The United States is the world's larges consumer of oil. We could reduce our dependence on oil by carpooling, using public transportation, building bike paths and just driving less.

Using renewable energy sources whenever possible will reduce the need for fossil fuel usage. It may not be possible to stick solar panels to the roof of your house, but, if you can switch to an energy provider that uses wind power, and take 'green' public transport if it is offered in your area, then you will be doing your bit for the environment.

Another change that could help in a big way is to consider environmental issues during election time =96 voting for a government that supports conservation and renewable engergy sources would be a big step forward. Become a smarter traveler and do your part to save the earth. Visit http://www.every1loves2travel.com for great tips and articles about gas credit cards, air travel and much more. ]]> Kyoto Protocol and What it Means http://www.artwoo.com/article/kyoto-protocol-and-what-it-means http://www.artwoo.com/article/kyoto-protocol-and-what-it-means#comments Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:08:31 +0000 greenhouse gas concentrationsgreenhouse gas emissionsgreenhouse gaseskyoto protocolburning of fossil fuelscredit certificatesclimate system http://www.artwoo.com/article/kyoto-protocol-and-what-it-means Kyoto Protocol' from the name of the place where it was signed. As of now, 170 countries have committed to implement the Protocol. The only exceptions are Kazakhstan, Brazil, India, China and USA who are not bound by it.

The clearly defined objective was to achieve 'stabilization of in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the .'The Protocol makes a distinction between the carbon dioxide produced naturally through respiration and decomposition and the one made by burning fossil fuel. The one that is caused by man is called anthropogenic. The emission of carbon dioxide from for generating power or for making cement is not a natural process. It is caused by man. It is therefore anthropogenic.

The Kyoto Protocol came into force on 16th February 2005. In terms of the Protocol, in a short period of five years from January 2008 to December 2012, the countries are required to reduce their to at least 5% below their 1990 levels. It is not an easy task. The production of the gases would have increased already from 1990 to 2007 and to roll it back seventeen years and further reduce by 5% is going to be very difficult to achieve.

But they have provided flexibility. The object is to reduce the global emission in totality. Therefore if a company could reduce it in a cheaper way than another, they could trade and benefit each other. The Kyoto Protocol has adopted a system of 'cap and trade' so that the companies can buy 'carbon credits' to offset against their emissions to comply with the reduction requirement. Carbon are issued to the industries effecting reduction in the emission of carbon dioxide and other by the UN agency. These Carbon Credit Certificates can be sold and cashed easily on the Stock Exchanges. Some of the polluting industries find it cheaper to buy these credits instead of reducing their own emissions. And so, the system is working. This has become a new business opportunity in the developing world as the mechanism provides easy financing of green projects. Many banks are buying the future Carbon Credit Certificates in advance at a discounted price to hasten the implementation of projects.

But if a company cannot meet its target emission reduction, many countries have adopted a system of Carbon Tax to be paid in default of compliance. The money collected from the Carbon Tax would be spent on forestation and other schemes to offset the emissions.

Thus the polluting companies like coal based thermal power plants, which spew out thousands of tons of carbon dioxide, have 3 options: (1) reduce emissions to the required level, and or (2) buy Carbon Credit Certificates to purchase the emission savings and or (3) pay the Carbon Tax. The companies can adopt a combination of the first 2 to achieve the emission reduction compliance which is labeled as 'carbon neutrality'. It's now become a fashion for companies to advertise their carbon neutrality to boost their image with the investing public.

It is a wonderful idea! The work towards emission reduction has now got the carrot and stick policy. Reduce emissions and get rewarded or else pay tax. There will be definite action as the idea is backed with money. The industry will exploit the potential of earning Carbon credits and in the process help to reduce their emissions of the greenhouse gases. We must give kudos to those who thought of it.

But will it solve the problem of Global warming? eMaya the expert on Climate Control has done an extensive analysis and has found a solution how to stop Global warming notwithstanding the burning of fossil fuel. Read all about it in the book 'eMaya' which is available on Amazon, or you can see it at www.trafford.com/08-0434Dilip Dahanukar studied engineering in India and management in the USA. He has rich experience in corporate management and finance. He is interested in environment which has resulted in the book eMaya: How to stop Global warming. Married to an artist (painter) he has 2 daughters both married, one of them residing in the US. He loves gardens and plants and spends his weekends in his forest-garden abode in the hills in India.]]> Carbon Monoxide Carbon Dioxide And Volatile Organic Compounds http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-monoxide-carbon-dioxide-and-volatile-organic-compounds http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-monoxide-carbon-dioxide-and-volatile-organic-compounds#comments Fri, 11 May 2007 20:15:01 +0000 harmless carbon dioxidehypercapniavolatile organic compoundsindoor air qualityindoor environmentshyperventilationsuffocation http://www.artwoo.com/article/carbon-monoxide-carbon-dioxide-and-volatile-organic-compounds indoor air quality concern that causes more accidental poisoning death each year in America than any other poison.

Carbon Dioxide On the other hand carbon dioxide does not typically build up to levels in the ambient indoor air that can result in serious negative health effects. Carbon dioxide itself is not a serious concern in most but is tested as part of an indoor air quality investigation because elevated levels of carbon dioxide indicates poor building ventilation, and this same poor ventilation not only results in the build up of typically , but also causes the build up of various air born irritants such as body odor, , particulate matter, and bio-allergens.

Indoor levels of carbon dioxide should be under 1000 ppm or no more than 700 ppm higher than outdoor levels.

High levels of carbon dioxide can cause similar effects to carbon monoxide if it can build up to dangerous levels indoors but this does not typically happen indoors. is typically caused by extreme concentrations of carbon dioxide such as are encountered from re breathing exhaled carbon dioxide such may occur with scuba diving complications, not breathing properly ( like conditions, ) or from volcanoes belching out massive amounts of carbon dioxide.

Carbon dioxide itself is not a direct indoor air quality concern in most indoor environments however considering all the various industrial processes going on in indoor environments every day their always may be some strange exceptions where neglect and carelessness can result in indoor levels of carbon dioxide becoming high enough to limit the amount of available oxygen.

Volatile Organic Compound levels in indoor environments (VOC's)

what are normal levels of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) levels Global consensus has resulted in the emergence of preliminary guidelines or tVOC standards for IAQ (Australian NHMRC, 1993; Finnish society of IAQ, 1995: Seifert, 1999: Hong Kong EPA, 1999; Japan MoH, 2000).

Depending on Location (home, school, etc. ), recommended levels range from 200 to 1300 ug/m3 or about 50 to 325 ppb .05 to .325 ppm (Toluene units) or approximately 100 to 650 ppb .1 to .650 isobutylene unis.

By all acounts the IAQ tVOC threshold for normal environments should not exceed 500 ppb (0.5 ppm) Toluene units, which is equivalent to 1000 ppb (1ppm) isobutylene units.

Field experience suggests the following guide for the use of PIDs to assess indoor environments:

< 100 ppb or (.1ppm) isobutylene units: normal outdoor air

100-400 ppb or (.1-.4ppm) isobutylene units normal indoor air

500 + ppb or (.5ppm) + isobutylene units: indicates potential of IAQ contaminants

Reference RAE Systems Application Note AP-212 Daryl Watters has a bachelors degree in education for teaching biology and general science and is a certified mold inspector, certified home inspector, and certified indoor environmentalist providing building inspections in South Florida since 1993. For more information visit http://www.floridamoldinspectors.us http://www.florida-mold-inspection.com ]]> Reducing The Carbon Footprint Of The Internet http://www.artwoo.com/article/reducing-the-carbon-footprint-of-the-internet http://www.artwoo.com/article/reducing-the-carbon-footprint-of-the-internet#comments Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:25:02 +0000 free web hostingcarbon footprintfree web hostcarbon neutralucluegas emissionssolar energy http://www.artwoo.com/article/reducing-the-carbon-footprint-of-the-internet
A new web hosting company, based on Salt Spring Island, is set to become Canada's first carbon-. Host is offering 100% carbon that generates zero green house . While consumers are familiar with the term carbon-neutral, many will be hearing the phrase `carbon-free' for the first time.

Company founder, Aaron Handford explored the idea on a recent trip to San Francisco earlier this year. "I was really impressed with the idea of reducing the "" of the Internet. By using solar power to host the sites I saw an opportunity to make a difference in a real way. Instead of using the "" system where companies purchase carbon credits to offset their green house gas emissions, we offer a cleaner solution =96 websites powered by solar energy =96 nothing comes from the grid, it's carbon-free."

How much carbon is "the net" itself generating? According to Handford, "The Internet has a big carbon footprint. It's estimated that globally it takes about 868 billion kWh (kilowatt hours) of electricity per year to run the Internet, associated PCs, routing infrastructure, and phone networks." (.com/index.php?xq=724" >http://uclue.com/index.php?xq=724)

He notes, "Of this, about 112.5 Billion kWh are used to power `data centers', which are the servers that store all the websites."

It has been estimated that as of early 2007 there were about 108,810,358 of these websites in existence. (See the link below for further details. (http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html)

This represents a lot of energy, and potentially a lot of CO2 emissions. What can be done to reduce the carbon footprint of the Internet? Handford has some suggestions for those willing to research the net itself for answers. "There are web hosting packages now available that are responding to the need to be `carbon friendly'. My company Solar Energy Host powers our websites directly with solar energy." Handford adds, "If your website is currently sitting on a server powered by energy from the grid, then you are tied to a system where you can never be sure where that energy is coming from, possibly from the burning of coal or other greenhouse gas producing sources. Solar Energy Host offers consumers another choice =96 a way to get your website off the energy grid."

What makes it possible is a state-of-the art server that is part of the only solar powered professional web server system in the world. The servers and technology are based in California where solar powered solutions are cropping up in dramatic fashion. A Salt Spring Island based company; Solar Energy Host presents a great hosting solution =96 and another way to make a difference in the fight to stop global warming.

Handford went on to explain that the data center used by Solar Energy Host stops the emission of the following gasses/toxins:

* 19,890 lbs of Carbon Dioxide (CO2/GHG) per year * 5.9 lbs of Nitrous Oxide (NOX/smog) per year * 0.45 lbs of Sulfur Dioxide (SO4/acid rain) per year

He is also following a socially responsible business model by giving back. "We donate five dollars from each account to the `Gardens of Hope' Project," says Handford. "This money funds the planting of one tree and helps link five communities in Lesotho, southern Africa, into a network of projects that share ideas, skills, resources and common purpose while supporting the educational needs of orphaned and vulnerable children."

For more information please visit: http://www.solarenergyhost.com Aaron Handford is president of http://www.solarenergyhost.com He is excited about reducing the carbon footprint of the Internet. ]]> Politicians Put the Car Into CO2 http://www.artwoo.com/article/politicians-put-the-car-into-co2 http://www.artwoo.com/article/politicians-put-the-car-into-co2#comments Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:50:19 +0000 kyoto targetscar journeyscarbon dioxide emissionmotor magazinesengine emissionscarbon emissionsforward areas http://www.artwoo.com/article/politicians-put-the-car-into-co2 carbon dioxide emission on the majority of their new models, according to environmental campaigners. A pan-European lobby group, Transport and Environment (T and E), has called the industry out for fighting against current EU legislation and, even more worryingly, proposed future limits.

Car travel contributes a large chuck of Europe's C02 limits, with individual being one of the most straight that people can address if they wish to reduce their carbon footprint. , despite increased public awareness on the issue of climate change, have continued to rise across the EU. Britain looks likely to meet its , however emissions from aviation and shipping, as well as other forms of transport, are not including in this carbon balance sheet, a fact which leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of many environmental campaigners.

In fact, transport in the EU was responsible for just under 30% of all emissions in 2006, an increase of 35% on 1990's level. The assumption that car manufacturers, consumers and politicians, in being well informed about climate change, will naturally act to reduce emissions is clearly wayward. Transport and the Environment highlight the fact that the 14 biggest car manufacturers in the EU still have to reduce by 17% to reach the EU's 2012 targets.

Transport and Environment's report does not place responsibility solely at the door of the giant motor industry. It also found that car buyers were unwilling, as yet, to take the effort into leaving behind their penchant for gas guzzling past models in favour of low-emission, more environmentally friendly vehicles. A change in consumer culture would surely drive a response from the manufactures, who are, after all, as eager to meet the most up-to-date aspirations of their target demographic.

With and television programmes still dominated by an outmoded, puerile appetence for speedy and sex y cars, it seems unlikely that this change in culture is anywhere close to arriving.

The fact that many car adverts now tout their emissions levels gives some cause for hope, as it suggests that, at the very least, people are aware of the environmental issues that are so inherent with driving.

Whilst consumers are currently left to their own free will when considering their next car purchase, the manufactures are, in theory, being forced to alter the carbon emissions of their current models thanks to EU legislation, legislation that is expected to become more stringent in the immediate future.

The German manufacturer BMW was identified by the report as having made an effective step toward the goal of reducing the negative impacts that their cars have. In 2007 the manufacturer managed to cut the emissions of its entire fleet by just over 7%, through an engineering process designed to reduce carbon emissions.

Overall though the German car industry has been one of the most vocally opposed groups to influence its domestic politicians. Thanks to intensive lobbying Agela Merkel, their chancellor, has made a compromise with Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, to reduce the penalties that car manufacturers will incur if they break the legislation. They also discredited the need for immediate efforts to be made to halt climate change by phasing in, rather than just introducing, target emissions, proof, if proof were needed, that politicians and businesspeople should be kept as far apart as gunpowder and naked flames.Matt Gammie is a writer for Ecoswitch]]> Is A Hybrid Car For You http://www.artwoo.com/article/is-a-hybrid-car-for-you http://www.artwoo.com/article/is-a-hybrid-car-for-you#comments Sat, 09 Sep 2006 12:27:18 +0000 hybrid carscivic hybridgasoline electric hybrid carbest gas mileagegasoline engine2006 honda civictraditional gasoline http://www.artwoo.com/article/is-a-hybrid-car-for-you
A hybrid car has a both a and a battery. The battery is recharged by energy from the gasoline engine that would normally be lost during braking or decelerating. The car uses either the battery or the gasoline engine depending on several factors including how fast the car is traveling. Sometimes, both will work together to provide an extra boost of power without using too much extra fuel.

The result of this technology is cars that get significantly better gas mileage and produce less carbon dioxide emissions that powered cars. For example, according to Honda, the 2006 gets 50 miles to the gallon on the highway, 14 miles to the gallon better than the 2003 regular Civic. When driven the national average of 12,000 miles, that represents a savings of 69 gallons of gas and 258 pounds of carbon dioxide per year.

In the early days of , there were few models to choose from. People desiring to purchase a hybrid car were stuck in tiny cars with little cargo space. Today, however, manufacturers produce hybrid cars and light trucks in nearly every category including family-sized sedans, sport utility vehicles and minivans. The smallest cars still get the , but larger hybrids consistently outperform their regular siblings in gas mileage and carbon dioxide emissions.

Unfortunately, hybrid cars cost more than regular models. In the case of the , the hybrid model costs almost $7,000 more than the regular model. Congress passed a law providing tax credits for hybrid car owners that took effect on January 1, 2006 that would save the buyer of a 2006 Civic Hybrid $2,100. It would take several years to break even on the purchase of a hybrid counting gasoline savings alone. However, many hybrid owners are as dedicated to the environmental benefits of driving a hybrid as they are to the money they save.

One of the fears when hybrid cars first became available was that maintenance and insurance costs would be prohibitive. Research has shown that regular maintenance costs for hybrid vehicles are no higher than for regular vehicles. Additionally, hybrid car owners are less likely to be involved in accidents and some insurance companies have begun offering discounts to hybrid car owners. Kadence Buchanan writes articles for http://iautomotiveworld.com/ - In addition, Kadence also writes articles for http://livingtheoutdoorslife.com/ and http://recreationandmore.com/ ]]> If You Believe Asthmatics Have Weak Lungs - Think Again! http://www.artwoo.com/article/if-you-believe-asthmatics-have-weak-lungs-think-again http://www.artwoo.com/article/if-you-believe-asthmatics-have-weak-lungs-think-again#comments Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:15:01 +0000 asthmacarbon dioxidechild coughsinhalerafflictioncasino royalet draw http://www.artwoo.com/article/if-you-believe-asthmatics-have-weak-lungs-think-again asthmatics have weak lungs. Why is that and what if it's wrong?

I know from reading some stories of people, who have asthma, they feel that maybe they are inferior because they have to rely on their s to keep up with everyone else. Not just in sport but also in everyday life. In one article I read, one young teenager used to use hide away and use his inhaler in private because he didn't want anybody to know that he needed one. That it was a type of . Why was that?

Was it because he felt that he's was weaker or sicklier person for having asthma? Like one of those old Dickenson novels where a and splutters in the corner of the room and all the adults look over and mumble to each other... "tut, tut, poor Jimmy's a weak lad and he's just going to have to accept he'll never be as good as the rest of the kids." Is this still the way we think of asthmatics?

But I think that's starting to change the more we are discovering about asthma and the more people we see in the news and from the sport world that have bettered them selves and have helped to do away with this stigma. Heck, it's even become a bit cooler and more mainstream to use an inhaler in public, even the baddie in the last "James Bond =96 " relied on one.

But what if all that thinking was wrong? What if asthmatics actually are better than us, non- asthmatics? What if their asthma is just their body's way to draw attention to something that needs to be sorted out urgently? But non asthmatics bodies don' attention to this and just carry on. Could this be the true?

Believe it or not this seems to be the case. Did you know that the level of in your body is just as important as the level of oxygen? We all assume that because carbon dioxide is a waste product of breathing it's a bad thing and must be removed from the body. But the levels are very important for our breathing. The level of carbon dioxide in our alveoli of the lungs controls how long we can go between breaths. The higher the level the longer the space between breaths.

Your body was given a natural mechanism to control this but if we over breathe the level of carbon dioxide can go quickly down. Over breathing is when you breathe in more oxygen and breathe out too much carbon dioxide which puts the balance out of whack. Our body reacts to a lower level of carbon dioxide by closing down and narrowing the airways in the lungs to prevent any more carbon dioxide from escaping.

So what can you do to cut down on over breathing? Mouth breathing is usually the starting place of over breathing. Using the mouth rather than the nose allows more oxygen to enter the lungs and a higher amount of carbon dioxide to escape. The reason for this is that the nose has a smaller opening which limits the amount of air that can enter and exit. This could also be the reason why breathing through the nose is 50% harder than using the mouth as this extra resistance causes the body to slow down its breathing and stops the tendency to over breathe. Also mouth breathing allows the airways to cool down and lose moisture which can be a trigger for an asthma attack.

So rather than the idea of asthmatics having weak lungs it's been found that this natural mechanism works better in their bodies compared to everyone else. People with asthma have this mechanism in a high gear idea and they're bodies respond faster to sort this imbalance out, where as other people bodies continue on working on an unhealthy low level of carbon dioxide. (Some experts believe that this could be the link to where a lot of modern diseases and conditions have come from). Visit http://www.BreatheYourAsthmaAway.com now and discover how you can use a simple, step-by-step system to cure your asthma, just by changing how you breathe! ]]> Can Carbon Dioxide Reduction in the Air Cause Famine? http://www.artwoo.com/article/can-carbon-dioxide-reduction-in-the-air-cause-famine http://www.artwoo.com/article/can-carbon-dioxide-reduction-in-the-air-cause-famine#comments Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:57:48 +0000 respiration of plantsgreen house gasesgreenhouse gasesburning fossil fuelsbasic chemical reactionlayer of the atmosphereanimals and plants http://www.artwoo.com/article/can-carbon-dioxide-reduction-in-the-air-cause-famine basic chemical reaction of combustion: Carbon plus Oxygen to make Carbon dioxide for giving energy to all forms of life on the planet. It is called respiration. The breathe in the oxygen which reacts with the carbon in the starch or sugar in the living cells to form carbon dioxide which we breathe out. The reaction is reversible with the energy of the Sun in photosynthesis which converts the carbon dioxide back into starch which is the food we eat and in the process releases oxygen back into the atmosphere. In this manner the energy of the Sun is obtained by our bodies from food and utilized with the help of oxygen which we breathe in. The entire and sole source of energy of all living beings is nothing else except the Sun.

The total quantity of carbon which is taken out of the atmosphere by photosynthesis in plant growth is about 100 to 120 billion tons of which about 40 to 50 billion tons is returned back as and animals and about 50 to 60 billion from the bacterial activity in decomposing organic materials. The quantity added by is only about 5.5 billion tons.

The concentration of carbon dioxide has been gradually increasing over the last few decades at about 1 to 2 ppm per year. It is now at about 380 ppm or about 0.4% of air. It is one of the constituent of what are known as the '.' The other major are water vapor, ammonia, and nitrous oxide. These gases in the tropopause which is about 30,000 feet above the ground, contribute to global warming through their ability to reduce the radiation from the Earth and thereby result in global warming. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control (IPCC) has determined their effect at 1.6 watts per sq. meter. This is quite small as compared to the total energy of 342 watts per sq. meter from the Sun. The amount of energy reflected back into space is about 30% i.e 77 watts per sq. meter, which is 50 times more than the effect of the greenhouse gases.

Prof. Stephan Salter of the University of Edinburgh has proposed a solution for Global warming which entails creation of low level white clouds over the sea to reflect off Sun's energy and reduce the amount of heat absorbed from the Sun. This project can economically counter the effect of increased level of carbon dioxide in the air.

Scientists have proved that the rate of growth of plants is dependent on the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. The larger is carbon dioxide, the more is the growth and vice-a-versa. The increased level of carbon dioxide is helpful in growing more food, though it may have a global warming effect. Decrease in the carbon dioxide level may lead to famine. eMaya, the expert on Climate Change and Global warming, has found a solution for the 2 opposing forces for the planet. How to stop Global warming and continue to increase the food production. Read all about it in the 'eMaya' book. www.trafford.com/08-0434The author Dilip Dahanukar studied engineering in India and management in the USA. He has rich experience in corporate management and finance. His interest in environment and computer possibilities has resulted in this book 'eMaya'. He spends his weekends in his forest-garden abode in the hills in India.]]> Why Not Try a Sparkling Rose Wine? http://www.artwoo.com/article/why-not-try-a-sparkling-rose-wine http://www.artwoo.com/article/why-not-try-a-sparkling-rose-wine#comments Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:22:25 +0000 standard classification systemrose winesrose winesparkling wineswhite winesred wineswine sales http://www.artwoo.com/article/why-not-try-a-sparkling-rose-wine standard classification system is not in use. Red and are the 2 major classes in the classification of wine, and in the general sense of the term, they represent the approximate colour of the wine. Apart from that, a number of characteristics are also used to classify wines. Sparkle is one such feature and wines that have a fizz are called as . These wines have some quantity of carbon dioxide in them that imparts the fizz to these wines, similar to soft drinks.

Sparkling is especially very famous as it is one of the few wines that taste really good with the sparkle rather than without it. As is obvious, are . These wines taste real good and have an aroma. After carbon dioxide is added during bottling, sparkling rose wine is ready and once opened, the contents will fizz out. Generally, carbon dioxide is filled up to a pressure of 2 to 3 atmospheres in these bottles and one must be careful not to subject the bottle of vigorous vibrations, or the contents can splash out. Champagne is a sparkling wine and is used as a celebration drink; it is always "shaken well before use" so that the contents fizz out and mark the celebration mood.

Sparkling rose wine is produced in a number of places including France, Italy and the U.S. The sales of sparkling rose wine are high as compared to other luxury wines and this product is a "hit" in the online market. Sparkling rose wine is available as a sparkling wine or a semi-sparkling wine, the difference between the two being the level of carbon dioxide in the bottle. Sparkling rose wine has a carbon dioxide pressure of over 2.5 atmospheres in the bottled condition whereas semi-sparkling rose wine has a carbon dioxide pressure of 1 to 2.5 atmospheres.

Sparkling rose wine is one of the stars of the rose wine family. Rose wines are known for their mild colour which can be anything between pale orange to a deep shade of pink. Apart from the colour, there is no connection of rose wines with the flower 'rose' that we all know. Rose wines have all the health benefits of red wines. Sparkling rose wine is thus not only good to taste for enjoyment but also healthy. As is always said about wines, moderation is the key to taking complete advantage of all the health benefits they have to offer, sparkling rose wine should also be consumed in moderate quantities, not exceeding 2-3 glasses a day. Regular, moderate consumption has good health benefits and hence, is highly recommended for everyone.James Copper is a writer for http://www.cecwine.co.uk where you can find out about wine gifts]]> Can Eating Less Red Meat Really Save the Environment? http://www.artwoo.com/article/can-eating-less-red-meat-really-save-the-environment http://www.artwoo.com/article/can-eating-less-red-meat-really-save-the-environment#comments Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:43:23 +0000 carbon dioxide emissionsunhealthy eating habitsgreenhouse gasescarbon dioxide and methaneharmful toxinscow farmmeat consumption http://www.artwoo.com/article/can-eating-less-red-meat-really-save-the-environment carbon dioxide emissions to be released in to the environment. Depending on the food, the amount of toxic emissions will vary but these studies suggest the processing of beef is one of the highest producers of carbon dioxide emissions.

It is also been proven that keeping livestock for purposes of food production increased the toxic chemicals being released in the air because the animals themselves produce methane gases through natural bodily functions. Cows can produce more that your average car! A standard can literally produce tons of in a year. These are two major that contribute to the global warming epidemic.

Experts state that if consumers would reduce their by 20%, It would help the environment considerably. There would be less need to raise herds of livestock for food production and therefore cut down on the amount of gases released into the air. If your diet changes would grow to include primarily vegetarian dishes, the destruction of the global environment can be reduced dramatically. There are critics who pan the studies results and deny that reducing meat consumption can save the planet but in reality, what's so terrible about eating a healthier diet of fresh vegetables and trying new recipes?

Eating red meat has been linked to some risks of cancers and as it is, consumers are just not getting enough nutrients in their current diets. The consumption of proteins has doubled in just a short period of time. Nutritionist warn that unless you change your and reduce the amount of meat you eat and replace it with fresh vegetables, grains, and fish, you are subjecting your body to various illnesses and disease.

There is more of a global interest in improving the environment and the state of our overall health. If reducing the amount of meat-centered meals will help solve heath conditions as well as global warming problems, there is no harm in trying. Start incorporated different dishes into your daily diet, one new meal at a time and don't be afraid to experiment with new recipes. Eating healthier does not mean forgoing flavors and good taste, it just mean changing how you eat and how you think about eating. Preparing your own more health conscious meals at home also can help save you a bundle on your grocery bill.

Bad health and a damaged environment are two issues that are not going away anytime soon. Take the initiative to explore new avenues of food and food preparation. Take a class or two to learn new ways to prepare your new favorite dishes and chances are you won't be sorry with the changes that you have made.Georgina White has developed ways to make great tasting food using healthier methods. She feels that it's important to be kind to your body and provide it with healthy foods while letting the taste buds enjoy it too!]]> Climate Change -- What's All That About? http://www.artwoo.com/article/climate-change-whats-all-that-about http://www.artwoo.com/article/climate-change-whats-all-that-about#comments Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:32:04 +0000 climate change conferencescarbon dioxide emissionsatmosphere trapsearthunfortunatelykyoto protocolcar ownership http://www.artwoo.com/article/climate-change-whats-all-that-about atmosphere traps some of the Sun's energy, warming the enough to support life as we know it!

When humans cut down trees or burn fossil fuels, they release extra carbon into the atmosphere, increasing the greenhouse effect. Mass deforestation around the world at an unprecedented rate is making the problem worse year by year.

, due to this climate change the earth is getting warmer as temperatures at the Earth's surface have increased by an estimated 1.4F (0.8C) between 1900 and 2005. The past decade was the hottest of the past 150 years and perhaps the past millennium. The hottest 22 years on record have occurred since 1980, and 2005 was the hottest on record.

The on cutting , believed to be the key cause of global warming, expires in 2012 and does not require major developing nations to make reductions. In addition, the US has rejected it. Increasing car usage around the world is leading to carbon dioxide emissions increasing not decreasing. As incomes rise in India and China, they are obviously looking at as a status symbol and the benefits that it brings. With nearly 2.5 billion between these 2 countries, this increased car ownership could cancel out any gains made in the West through reducing factory and car emissions.

Scientists and those in the know predict that climate-induced floods, rising sea levels, more frequent and intense hurricanes, famine, drought and conflict could also reverse recent gains in reducing poverty around the world and that the USA and UK will be affected by all or some of the above.

Climate change presents a significant challenge to the UK and to the international community. Recent in Montreal and the G8 and the Gleneagles Summit have attempted to co-ordinate the international response to climate change.

There are also enormous opportunities if we are willing to take action. Government, business and individuals all have a part to play, and all of us will benefit from rising to the challenge of reducing the harm to the environment.

While some of the effects of climate change may be positive, such as longer growing seasons in certain countries and longer, hotter summers in the UK. These positive impacts are unlikely to be sustained as the globe continues to warm. Similarly, many developing countries are even more vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change and less able to adapt due to lack of money and will power. David Oglaza is the founder of the Green and Ethical business http://www.guidemegreen.com . This growing green resource lists 100s of Organic, Fairtrade, Eco and Ethical companies. We even have Green jobs and a Green Forum! ]]> Air-bath And Good Health http://www.artwoo.com/article/air-bath-and-good-health http://www.artwoo.com/article/air-bath-and-good-health#comments Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:19:59 +0000 release oxygencarbon dioxidelungscellsgreen plantsbeneficialdeep breathing http://www.artwoo.com/article/air-bath-and-good-health
Oxygen is essential for the process of combustion taking place in all the various of the body. We obtain this oxygen from the air. When we inhale, oxygen of the air dissolves in the blood flowing through the fine capillaries in the , and is thus carried to every cell in the body.

and other toxic substances are formed in the cells as the end pr6ducts of combustion and other processes taking place in the cells. Carbon dioxide thus formed dissolves in the blood. When this impure blood carrying carbon dioxide reaches the lungs, carbon dioxide is released into the air present in tt1e lungs, and is exhaled with it.

Thus when we breathe in, oxygen of the air enters the lungs and dissolves in the blood. When we breathe out, carbon dioxide formed in the body is expelled. In short, the blood gets purified in the lungs. Even this elementary information is sufficient to make the importance of obvious to everyone.

The main source of oxygen on the earth is vegetation such as trees, shrubs and other . Plants take up carbon dioxide from the air for their nutrition and growth, and into the air. The proportion of oxygen in the atmosphere is, therefore, somewhat greater in areas covered with greenery. Densely populated and industrial areas, on the other hand, are comparatively deficient In oxygen, and polluted in other ways. The thoughtless and wanton destruction of vegetation going on - today aggravates this deficiency and pollution.

All these facts make it obvious that a walk in open space~ covered with greenery, such as gardens and fields, is highly , especially when accompanied by deep breathing to ventilate the lungs. The cool breeze of early mornings, being fresh, pure and rich in oxygen, purifies the blood and the body, and fills the mind with cheer and joie de vivre. The salubrious effects of fresh air on the body, mind and health are universally recognized.

Some suggestions:

(1) Always breathe through the nose. The hair in the nose performs the function of a filter, removing the fine dust particles in the air. Moreover, the air gets warmed up in passing through the nasal passages, which has a salutary effect in the lungs.

(2) Always take deep breaths. The breathing of most city people leading sedentary lives is shallow. The result is that carbon dioxide is not eliminated properly, and toxins consequently accumulate in the body.

(3) Do not cover the face while sleeping.

(4) In winter, protect yourself from the cold with warm coverings as necessary; but keep the windows open. Author's sites: http://www.herbalremedieslk.com , http://myshabi.blogspot.com , http://myaroma.blogspot.com ]]> Population Growth and the Envrionment - What's at Stake http://www.artwoo.com/article/population-growth-and-the-envrionment-whats-at-stake http://www.artwoo.com/article/population-growth-and-the-envrionment-whats-at-stake#comments Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:57:22 +0000 world population growthhuman habitburning of fossil fuelsemissions levelsnew paradigmsco2 emissionspopulation levels http://www.artwoo.com/article/population-growth-and-the-envrionment-whats-at-stake World population growth is accelerating. True, the rate has halved since the historical peak of 2.2% in the 1960s, but estimates show that by 2050, population numbers will be close to 9 billion - almost 3 billion more than current rates. Increased growth has led to the concept of the mega city; huge and densely populated urban areas, high in CO2 because of the vast concentration of people. There are now more than 25 mega cities in the world, each harbouring in excess of 10m people. Compare this to the early 1800s, in which just 3% of the world's population inhabited cities, and it is easy to see why population growth has become an important area of study; it is rapid and consuming, and concepts like the mega city show just how the way in which we live enters according to - now the number of people who live cities is closer to 50%.

What does this mean for concerns over climate change, global warming, and ?

Technically speaking, population growth does not have to affect these problems at all; there is no inherent link between pollution and increased population, nor is there a link between CO2 emissions and population growth. Certainly, there is the simple fact that more people means more CO2 being released into the atmosphere through the conversion of oxygen, but this carbon can be encompassed within the existing carbon cycle, meaning that - according to definition - it is not contributing per say to global warming. With that in mind, it is perfectly possibly to argue that, though the link exists, there is no need for population growth to affect CO2 emissions, climate change, or global warming.

What makes growing population a problem for climate change is . In the age of industry, in the paradigm of consumption and mass production, carbon emission has become a necessity; the as a cheap and efficient energy source has dominated human production since the industrial revolution, and has reigned for 200 years. Under such a system, population growth is dangerous for world climate change and CO2 emissions levels, because the system dictates that production must rise with population, so that carbon levels, too, must necessarily rise. Indeed this is evident in the break down of rising CO2 emissions rates, in which up to 25% can be attributed to transport modes. That percentage will rise under the current system as populations rise.

Population growth, then, is not detrimental to the environment by default, but has a serious effect because of the system of mass production and carbon based energy. To curb that problem, we need a new paradigm and a new system, in which either mass production is halted, or carbon based energy is made obsolete. With the first of those options looking at this time an effectual impossibility, we must enter a new paradigm under the protocol of the second option; the switch from carbon based energy, to renewable energy. That way, the rapid growth of populations across the world need not add to the ever more serious problems of global warming, CO2 emissions, and climate change.Chris Woolfrey is an expert on climate change, CO2 emissions, and global warming. He writes for http://www.ecoswitch.com]]> Learn About Fuel Catalysts http://www.artwoo.com/article/learn-about-fuel-catalysts http://www.artwoo.com/article/learn-about-fuel-catalysts#comments Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:25:00 +0000 fuel catalystsgas mileagethis means thatfuel catalystgasolinehorsepowerfuel burns http://www.artwoo.com/article/learn-about-fuel-catalysts horsepower, decrease its emissions, and get you better ? You'd probably be totally for it or think I was completely insane. Well, I know of a product that does all the above. s are simply chemicals, usually in liquid or pill form, that you add into your gas tank. After a short time, you'll get better gas mileage, more power, and be helping the environment. And fuel catalysts not only work in cars, vans, and SUVs; they also work in motorcycles, boats, RVs, farm equipment, generators, and pretty much anything that uses petroleum based fuels. If these products sound like something you're interesting in, just read on.



I've already told you what these fuel catalysts can do, but you're also probably wondering what they are and how they work. A catalyst in a reaction is an extra ingredient that makes the reaction go faster or more efficiently. In the case of fuel catalysts, they make the reaction of burning fuel more efficient. They don't actually mix with your ; they chemically alter in to a different substance. This new type of better than regular gasoline, making it more efficient.

So, how does this make your vehicle run better? When your vehicle runs normally, 85% of the energy produced by the reaction is heat. only 15% of the energy is actually going into running your engine. Also, there are a lot of byproducts produced that build up in your engine, making it even less efficient. When you add a fuel catalyst, the burning of gasoline or diesel becomes more efficient. This makes the engine operate at a lower temperature; meaning that less of the energy is being lost as heat and more of the energy is being used to power your car. This increases your car's horsepower and gas mileage. Adding a catalyst also produces fewer byproducts because of the increased efficiency of the reaction, meaning less buildup in your engine and even more efficiency. A cleaner engine also means that you'll have fewer breakdowns and need fewer tune-ups. This saves you even more money!



I also mentioned earlier that these fuel additives help reduce pollution. When a catalyst is added to a reaction, this means more of the final product in produced and byproducts are reduced. The muck in your engine is one bad byproduct, but it's not the only one. When fuel burns more efficiently, it produces more carbon dioxide and less carbon monoxide. You may think "but isn't carbon dioxide bad?" Well, yes, but carbon monoxide is more toxic. Plus, even though you're getting more carbon dioxide from each gallon; you're burning fewer gallons overall, so it's not really bad.



I've given you as much information about these products as I can, but I understand you may still be skeptical. The best way to find out if these products really work is to try them yourself. What I must warn you against is trying one dose of one of these products and then saying that it doesn't work because there was little improvement. Depending on the age of your vehicle, there may be a whole lot of gunk inside it that needs to be cleaned out. It may take using one of these products several times to see noticeable results. So, if you're really serious about saving money on gas and repairs, or on helping the environment; then you should stick with it before you decide this isn't working for you. Gray Rollins is a featured writer for http://www.fuelsavingzone.com/ - a site where you can get a great free report called 61 Ways to Save Money On Gas. Be sure to check out the blog at http://www.fuelsavingzone.com/blog/ for even more ways to save money at the pump. ]]> Aromatherapy 101 http://www.artwoo.com/article/aromatherapy-101 http://www.artwoo.com/article/aromatherapy-101#comments Sun, 24 Dec 2006 20:27:10 +0000 steam distillationaromatherapyessential oilslimbic systemparasympathetic nervous systemoil distillationdistillation process http://www.artwoo.com/article/aromatherapy-101 Aromatherapy is an increasingly accepted form of healing the body and mind through pure . Scoffed on as recently as a decade ago, aromatherapy is now used in many parts of the globe. The essential oils used in aromatherapy are products of volatile plant essences and their derivative aromatic molecules. The most common method that aromatherapy uses to capture these essential oils is .

Essential oils, in contrast to the more common cooking oils such as vegetable oil, are very concentrated. If someone were to apply an essential oil to their skin she or he would have to first dilute it.

Aromatherapy uses these pure essential oils to affect the body's through its . Another positive side effect of this aromatherapy essential oil procedure is to fight bacteria.

Because essential using steam, other methods are hydrodistillation, cold press, carbon dioxide conversion and through the use of phytols or florasols.

Hydrodistillation, similar to steam distillation of essential oils, simply uses water instead of steam for its aromatherapy production. The steam, once distilled, is chilled in a dispenser especially made for this aromatherapy process. Essential oils rise to the top of the mixture during this . The first form of aromatherapy essential oil processing, hydrodistillation requires a watchful eye all through its production. The still must not run dry and the contents must not overheat. The result of either mistake would be useless essential oils.

In the third aromatherapy production method carbon dioxide gets converted to liquid from its initial gaseous state. This is accomplished by subjecting it to high pressure. The resulting liquid solvent is inert and very safe. Aroma molecules of essential oils are extracted when the carbon dioxide is liquefied. The most advantageous form of aromatherapy processing, the carbon dioxide method uses all the solvent, leaving no residue behind. The remaining carbon dioxide simply evaporates once it is returned to normal pressure and temperatures. Rose Hip, Calendula and several other aromatics can only be created through the aromatherapy carbon dioxide method. These are among the strongest and richest of aromas developed for aromatherapy.

The aromatherapy cold press method produces essential oils that are more vibrant that those given off during steam distillation. Orange oil spray is one of the well known byproducts of cold press aromatherapy production. Orange oil is released by scoring or zesting the skin of the fruit.

The latest essential oil processing method is the use of a benign gas solvent in phytols and florasols. In 1986 Dr. Peter Wilde found that these plant materials gave off solvents that could extract aromatic essential oils. The method he founded was the lowering of the temperatures of florasols. The result was a clear and free flowing oil that was free of any wax. Dustin is owner of http://JustArticlesVIP.com and writes on a variety of subjects. To learn more about this topic Dustin recommends you visit: http://www.worldwideshoppingmall.co.uk/ ]]> Barack Obama and Global Warming http://www.artwoo.com/article/barack-obama-and-global-warming http://www.artwoo.com/article/barack-obama-and-global-warming#comments Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:08:26 +0000 http://www.artwoo.com/article/barack-obama-and-global-warming Is anybody sure about the cause of global warming? One thing is certain. The answer to THAT question is NO.

A lot of people would say it is air pollution, and the newest president of the USA seems to think so. Can a new government save future generations from global catastrophe? A market for cleaner-burning fuels might help stop climate change and President Obama's administration could make this possible. So a number of environmental groups and lobbyist groups hope.

One such special interest group is known as Ceros. This coalition of environmental organizations and investors wishes for Obama to curtail global warming. They figure he could pass legislation to reduce green house gas emissions by 25% below 1990 levels before 2020, and they might be right.

One step in achieving this end is "honest accounting of financial risks that companies and investors face from climate change," according to Ceros. Another might be dispensing with a system of emissions credits to force this honest accounting instead of providing an avenue for deep-pocketed corporations from easily buying their way out of responsibility.

Who wouldn't want Barack Obama's government to take charge in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and rates of deforestation? Is this even the right person for the job? No one person can do it all, of course.

According to Obama, "The issue of climate change is one that we ignore at our own peril. There may still be disputes about exactly how much is naturally occurring, but what we can be scientifically certain of is that our continued use of fossil fuels is pushing us to a point of no return. And unless we free ourselves from a dependence on these fossil fuels and chart a new course on energy in this country, we are condemning future generations to global catastrophe."

This tells us that he has some regard for scientific research, and that he believes we CAN do something about global warming. Applying science correctly provides a good start to arriving at a solution. And scientists will play a big role in finding a solution, even if that solution is simply a "wait and see what happens".

A scientific approach includes taking off the blinders and thinking creatively to arrive at one or several solutions. Focussing on carbon in initiatives such as the National Low Carbon Fuel Standard, which is trying to find "clean" fuels instead of the ones we currently consume, takes the sights off other climate drivers and other greenhouse gases. Water vapour being chief amongst those.

Another example, please...

It has been said that the sun is the only source of global warming. A new energy economy proposed by Obama would rely on renewable energy such as solar and wind, both of which depend on sunlight. Other documents have said that extra sunspot activity can reduce cloud cover, resulting in a more heated planet/atmosphere system.

Furthermore, An Inconvenient Truth shows Al Gore putting carbon dioxide as the culprit as far as global warming is concerned. Anthropogenic carbon dioxide. But a credible theory of climate variations points to Milankovitch Cycles, where changes in earth-heating patterns occur in a recurring pattern.

Maybe Obama got in at the right time with his campaign promises and we will see improvements take place that would have happened without anybody's effort at all. Barack will certainly get the credit, though.Barry is an air quality scientist who writes about atmospheric environmental issues. See this Cause of Global Warming article for further perspective on global warming. Barry's Weather Man page gives you more about the author.]]>